The presence of electronic assistants inautomotive equipment has long been not a curiosity, even in the budget segment. The simplest assistants in different variations find their place even in budget cars and, as a rule, they are all aimed at simplifying the driver's functions and increasing the safety when driving. One of the most popular means of this type is a video camera with a rear view. It allows you to track what is happening in the so-called blind areas, not to detach from monitoring the main direction.
Partly the same tasks, but on a different basisdecides parking radar. The purpose of this device is somewhat specialized, but this does not belittle the significance of its function. Anyway, the question concerning what is better - a parking sensor or a rear-view camera, is quite justifiable to many motorists. To answer it, you need to understand in more detail how these systems differ and what are their advantages.
The kit includes a set of parking sensorssensors, control unit and fittings, which provide the possibility of fastening and communication between components. The principle of operation consists in ultrasound determination of the distance to the nearest object by sensors. For example, in the parking process, the driver can monitor the situation through a display that displays information on the data of the rear or front sensors. Depending on the model, parktronics on the car can provide information in an audio format. This option allows you not to be distracted by the display and respond to radar signals in time. The installation of this kit involves the physical installation of sensors in the front or rear bumpers. The number and configuration of the sensor location is chosen by the driver depending on his / her preferences and driving skills.
By its operation principle, such a system is simpler andmore clearly. In fact, it provides the translation of the video image from the problem zone to the display. That is, in the same rear space under the bumper or directly in it is attached a small camera, which, like a DVR, records what is happening in front of the car. As for the display, it can be represented by a full-fledged compact monitor on the control panel, and a miniature screen in the design of the rear-view mirror. It turns out to be quite simple, but also an effective configuration, which requires no more effort in mounting than parktronic. At the same time, the rear-view camera can be integrated into the standard multimedia system. In this case, you can eliminate the need for a separate display, since the video will be broadcast via a radio with a screen.
The majority of users of parktronics marktheir usefulness, ease of use and rather high accuracy of fixing dangerous situations. In other words, as an informant, parktronics on the car works with dignity and copes with its tasks. However, there are side effects, which should also be taken into account.
To negative factors of use of parkingradar include false triggers and failures in operation under adverse climatic conditions. But if from the second drawback manufacturers have almost got rid of the latest versions, the percentage of errors is still high. Therefore, the question of what is best - a parking sensor or a rear-view camera, due to false alerts of the radar system may suggest a response in favor of the second option.
It is as an assistant that such cameras are notare in great demand, since the returns will still depend on the driver. Many users, for example, point out that an effective application of the system is possible only in the case of constant attention on the monitor, without which the rear-view camera simply does not work. Reviews also emphasize that in conditions of bad weather, the device can be stained with dirt, and its function will become useless. But it is in difficult conditions that drivers often resort to the help of electronics.
The main advantage of parking radar remainsits sensitivity and reliability. Even if one considers that his signals can be false in a high percentage, this practically does not affect the level of security. Therefore, as an insurer against collisions this device can be useful especially for beginners. In turn, the video camera has a big plus as a simple and effective means of transferring pictures from the danger zone.
Accordingly, the question as to whatbetter - parktronik or rear-view camera, will assume a comparison for different operational effects. This means that the first option in the form of parktronics is suitable for inexperienced drivers who want to reliably secure themselves in the parking process. A video camera will suit an experienced driver, which simply needs to have a way of self-assessment of the situation through visual control.
More expensive kit with parking sensors. And its cost will depend not only on the company and technical characteristics, but also on the number of sensory elements. Standard kit for 4 sensors are standard rear parking sensors, the price of which can be 10-15 thousand rubles.
Price accessibility of video cameras to a greater extentdepends on the technical parameters, among which the resolution, shooting formats, etc. But the cost of such a device in quality-worthy executions is about the same 10 thousand rubles. Another thing is that the rear parking sensors, the price of which varies within the limits of 12-15 thousand rubles, usually include a display. In the case of a rear-view camera, this component can be supplied separately, and its inclusion will increase the price tag by another couple of thousand at least.
Practically in any service station when handlingrequest to provide the machine with an electronic assistant for control of the rear zone can hear a tempting proposal to install two systems simultaneously. In other words, the rear-view mirror, the parking sensor, the camera and the monitor with sound notification will have to simultaneously work on the task of informing the driver of the danger. But, despite the apparent advantages, this option is the least successful, since attention will be scattered to different notification channels, and this is highly undesirable.
Both solutions have their positive properties andweaknesses with which experienced motorists are well acquainted. And practice shows that for a confident driving the most profitable are simple and accessible systems for use. Therefore, the answer to the question about what is best - a parking sensor or a rear-view camera, will most often be in favor of compact video equipment. The reason is that the driver visually assesses the situation in the "dead" zone and makes a decision faster. At the same time, information from parking sensors gives only partial and indirect information about possible hazards, it does not allow to assess the situation in a complex manner. On the other hand, it is recommended to beginner car owners to use a radar. It is less convenient, but in situations of unhurried parking, its reliability is put on the first place by experts.
